Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 64/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,425,446); the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 229g).
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Lighter: 190g vs 229g
- Better portability (63/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1425446
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 54/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 22 points higher (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (63/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1240x2772 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×74.2×8.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | $889 |
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1240x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) by 53.9% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Reno11 Pro (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) (92/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 54/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) (78/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (63/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) by 22 points (86/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 54/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno11 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.