Honor Magic7 Lite vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 Lite (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 56/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Lite has the bigger battery (6600 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 736,675); the Honor Magic7 Lite is noticeably lighter (189g vs 229g).
Honor Magic7 Lite
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 6600 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 229g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 736675
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 935
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 2719
- Faster charging: 90W vs 66W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Lite vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 30 points higher (86/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (92/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (78/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (66/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Lite | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 736675 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 935 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2719 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.5×8.0 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | $889 |
Honor Magic7 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic7 Lite and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Honor Magic7 Lite by 76.2% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Magic7 Lite
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (92/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (93/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (78/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (66/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite by 30 points (86/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Lite over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.