Honor Magic7 Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 Lite (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 56/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6600); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 736,675); the Honor Magic7 Lite is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Honor Magic7 Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 736675
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 935
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2719
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 35 points higher (91/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 736675 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 935 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2719 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.5×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Honor Magic7 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic7 Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic7 Lite by 82.7% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Magic7 Lite
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (99/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (85/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite by 35 points (91/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.