Honor Magic7 Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 Lite (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 56/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6600); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 737,054); the Honor Magic7 Lite is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7 Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic7 Lite better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 737054
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2700
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 35 points higher (91/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 737054 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 930 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2700 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.5×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic7 Lite by 82.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic7 Lite
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (99/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (85/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite by 35 points (91/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.