Honor 500 Pro (China) vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Honor 500 Pro (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 84/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 500 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 500 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 3,092,340); the Honor 500 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 229g).
Honor 500 Pro (China)
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 3092340
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 201g vs 229g
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 34/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9494
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better camera (93/100 vs 78/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Honor 500 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 2 points higher (86/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Honor 500 Pro (China) | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.8×74.2×7.8 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | $889 |
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2736
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor 500 Pro (China) and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor 500 Pro (China) leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 0.9% in our overall performance rating.
Honor 500 Pro (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Honor 500 Pro (China) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 500 Pro (China) and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor 500 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor 500 Pro (China) over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor 500 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.