Honor 500 Pro (China) vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Honor 500 Pro (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 84/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 500 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 500 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 3,092,340); the Honor 500 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 500 Pro (China)
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Honor 500 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 3092340
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 201g vs 229g
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9287
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 78/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 500 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 2 points higher (86/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 500 Pro (China) | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.8×74.2×7.8 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | $889 |
Camera comparison
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2736
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 500 Pro (China) and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor 500 Pro (China) leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 1.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 500 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Honor 500 Pro (China) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 500 Pro (China) and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor 500 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor 500 Pro (China) over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor 500 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.