Honor 500 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 500 Pro (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 84/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 500 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,119,308); the Honor 500 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 230g).
Honor 500 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 201g vs 230g
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3119308
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9494
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Honor 500 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 7 points higher (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (86/100 vs 85/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor 500 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 155.8×74.2×7.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 230 g | |
| Price | — | $950 |
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2736
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor 500 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 500 Pro (China) by 26.6% in our overall performance rating.
Honor 500 Pro (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (86/100 vs 85/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Honor 500 Pro (China) by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 500 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 500 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Honor 500 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 500 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.