Honor 500 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 500 Pro (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 84/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 500 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,126,402); the Honor 500 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 500 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 500 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 201g vs 230g
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3126402
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 500 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 7 points higher (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (86/100 vs 85/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 500 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 155.8×74.2×7.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2736
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 500 Pro (China)
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 500 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 500 Pro (China) by 26.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 500 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 500 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (86/100 vs 85/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Honor 500 Pro (China) by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 500 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 500 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Honor 500 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 500 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.