Honor Magic7 Lite vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor Magic7 Lite (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 56/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Lite has the bigger battery (6600 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 737,054); the Honor Magic7 Lite is noticeably lighter (189g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7 Lite
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Honor Magic7 Lite better?
- Bigger battery: 6600 vs 6510 mAh
- Lighter: 189g vs 226g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 737054
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2700
- Faster charging: 90W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 32 points higher (88/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (94/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Lite | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 737054 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 930 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2700 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.5×8.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 Lite and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor Magic7 Lite by 77.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic7 Lite
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (94/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (81/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite by 32 points (88/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Magic7 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Lite over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.