Honor Magic7 Lite vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor Magic7 Lite (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 56/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Lite has the bigger battery (6600 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 736,675); the Honor Magic7 Lite is noticeably lighter (189g vs 226g).
Honor Magic7 Lite
Vivo X300 Pro
- Bigger battery: 6600 vs 6510 mAh
- Lighter: 189g vs 226g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 736675
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 935
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2719
- Faster charging: 90W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 31 points higher (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (93/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Lite | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 736675 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 935 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2719 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.5×8.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Honor Magic7 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic7 Lite and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor Magic7 Lite by 77.5% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Magic7 Lite
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (93/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite (81/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Lite by 31 points (87/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Magic7 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Lite over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Magic7 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.