Samsung Galaxy A33 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A33 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1280, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $370 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 46/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 613,957); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 85); the Samsung Galaxy A33 is noticeably lighter (186g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy A33
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 186g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $370 vs $950
- Better portability (66/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 613957
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 957
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2095
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 69/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A33 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 45 points higher (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A33 — 32/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (89/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A33 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A33 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 613957 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 957 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2095 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 85 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.7×74.0×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $370 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy A33
- Main: 48MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A33
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A33
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A33 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A33 by 85.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $580. Samsung Galaxy A33 was $580 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (99/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (89/100 vs 69/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 (85/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A33 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (66/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A33 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A33 by 45 points (91/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A33 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A33 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A33 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A33 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A33 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A33 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.