Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy A16 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 44/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 510,132).

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 by 40 points (84/100 vs 44/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A16

Performance 42
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 44
Portability 60
Value for money —

Vivo iQOO 13

Performance 91
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 82

What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 207g

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 510132
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 67/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 40 points higher (84/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (91/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (99/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (78/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (73/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).

Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A16 Vivo iQOO 13
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 510132 3150555
Geekbench Single 727 3013
Geekbench Multi 2047 9287
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1440x3168
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 200 g 207 g
Launch price — $650

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera

Vivo iQOO 13

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A16

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A16

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Vivo iQOO 13

  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A16 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A16 MediaTek Helio G99
44/100
510132 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +83.8%
3150555 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy A16 by 83.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A16

Price unknown

Vivo iQOO 13

$650

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (91/100 vs 42/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (99/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (78/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (73/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 by 40 points (84/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 42/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.