Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy A16 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 44/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 503,850); the Samsung Galaxy A16 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 by 45 points (89/100 vs 44/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A16
Performance 42
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 44
Portability 60
Value for money
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 better?
  • Lighter: 200g vs 217g

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 503850
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 45 points higher (89/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (83/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (60/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy A16: The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A16 Vivo X300s
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 503850 3703823
Geekbench Single 727 3228
Geekbench Multi 2047 9553
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 2800x1260
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 50 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
NFC yes
Protection IP54
Dimensions 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm
Weight 200 g 217 g
Launch price $723
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A16 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A16 MediaTek Helio G99
44/100
503850 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +86.4%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy A16 by 86.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A16
Price unknown
Vivo X300s
$723
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 42/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (83/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (60/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 by 45 points (89/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 42/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.