Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy A16 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 44/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 503,850); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 7.9mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 by 44 points (88/100 vs 44/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A16
Performance 42
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 44
Portability 60
Value for money
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 better?

  • Overall rating 44/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 503850
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 44 points higher (88/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (87/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (82/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (100/100 vs 60/100).

Samsung Galaxy A16: The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A16 Vivo X Fold6
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 503850 3485039
Geekbench Single 727 3228
Geekbench Multi 2047 9553
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 2480x2200
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 25W 80W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 20 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB
OS Android 14, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 200 g
Launch price $1900
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A16 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A16 MediaTek Helio G99
44/100
503850 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +85.5%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy A16 by 85.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A16
Price unknown
Vivo X Fold6
$1900
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 42/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (87/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (82/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (100/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 by 44 points (88/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 42/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.