Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy A16 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 44/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 510,132); the Samsung Galaxy A16 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A16
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 better?
- Lighter: 200g vs 309g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 510132
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 42/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 25 points higher (69/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (90/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy A16 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A16 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 510132 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A16 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy A16 by 82.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A16
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (90/100 vs 42/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy A16 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (52/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (63/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 by 25 points (69/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy A16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 42/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.