Samsung Galaxy A11 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy A11 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $180 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 20/100 (a 67-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,258,010 vs 176,718); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A11 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A11 is noticeably lighter (177g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy A11
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 177g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $180 vs $899
- Better portability (73/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3258010 vs 176718
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 301
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 831
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 13/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 32/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A11 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 67 points higher (87/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A11 — 8/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (93/100 vs 13/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (84/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (81/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (73/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A11 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 176718 | 3258010 | |
| Geekbench Single | 301 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 831 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×76.3×8.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 177 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $180 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy A11
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A11
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A11
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A11 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A11 by 94.6% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $719. Samsung Galaxy A11 was $719 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (93/100 vs 13/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (84/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (81/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (73/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 by 67 points (87/100 vs 20/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A11 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A11 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 13/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A11 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A11 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.