Samsung Galaxy A11 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A11 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $180 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 20/100 (a 71-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 176,718); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A11 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A11 is noticeably lighter (177g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy A11
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 177g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $180 vs $950
- Better portability (73/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 176718
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 301
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 831
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 13/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 32/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A11 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 71 points higher (91/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A11 — 8/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (99/100 vs 13/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (89/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (85/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A11 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 176718 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 301 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 831 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×76.3×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 177 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $180 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy A11
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A11
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A11
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A11 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A11 by 95.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $770. Samsung Galaxy A11 was $770 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (99/100 vs 13/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (89/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (85/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 by 71 points (91/100 vs 20/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A11 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A11 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 13/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A11 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A11 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.