Samsung Galaxy A11 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy A11 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $180 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 20/100 (a 71-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 176,718); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A11 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A11 is noticeably lighter (177g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 by 71 points (91/100 vs 20/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A11

Performance 13
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 25
Portability 73
Value for money 6

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Samsung Galaxy A11 better?

  • Lighter: 177g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $180 vs $950

  • Better portability (73/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 176718
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 301
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 831
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 13/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 32/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A11 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 71 points higher (91/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A11 — 6/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (99/100 vs 13/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (89/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (85/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A11 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 176718 4247433
Geekbench Single 301 3639
Geekbench Multi 831 11047
Display 6.4" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution — 3168x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging — 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS — Android 16
NFC no yes
Protection — IP69
Dimensions 161.4×76.3×8.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 177 g 230 g
Launch price $180 $950

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A11

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A11

  • 6.4" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A11

  • 4000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
25
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A11 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
20/100
176718 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +95.8%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A11 by 95.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A11

$180

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $770. Samsung Galaxy A11 was $770 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (99/100 vs 13/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (89/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (85/100 vs 25/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (73/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 by 71 points (91/100 vs 20/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A11 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy A11 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 13/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A11 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.