Samsung Galaxy A11 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy A11 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $180 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 20/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 176,718); the Vivo iQOO 13 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A11 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A11 is noticeably lighter (177g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A11
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy A11 better?
- Lighter: 177g vs 207g
- Cheaper at launch: $180 vs $650
- Better portability (73/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 176718
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 301
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 831
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 13/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A11 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 64 points higher (84/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A11 — 6/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (91/100 vs 13/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (99/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (73/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (73/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A11 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 176718 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 301 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 831 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.4" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×76.3×8.0 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 177 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $180 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A11
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A11
- 6.4" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A11
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A11 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy A11 by 94.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $470. Samsung Galaxy A11 was $470 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (91/100 vs 13/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (99/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (78/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 (73/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A11 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (73/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A11 by 64 points (84/100 vs 20/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A11 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy A11 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A11 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 13/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A11 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.