Poco X7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Poco X7 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $369 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 64/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Poco X7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,874,182); the Poco X7 Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Poco X7 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco X7 Pro

Performance 75
Display 83
Camera 37
Battery 65
Portability 59
Value for money 60

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Performance 90
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 46

What makes Poco X7 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Lighter: 195g vs 309g
  • Cheaper at launch: $369 vs $2899

  • Longer battery life (65/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 20/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1874182
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6100
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 37/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco X7 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 5 points higher (69/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Poco X7 Pro — 60/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (65/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).

Poco X7 Pro: The Poco X7 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco X7 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1874182 2926532
Geekbench Single 1579 3013
Geekbench Multi 6100 9287
Display 6.7" AMOLED 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2712x1220 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 90W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 20 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS Android 15 / HyperOS 2 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 160.8×75.2×8.3 mm 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 195 g 309 g
Launch price $369 $2899

Camera comparison

Poco X7 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera

Display comparison

Poco X7 Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display

Battery and charging

Poco X7 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
65
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco X7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
64/100
1874182 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +36.0%
2926532 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Poco X7 Pro by 36.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco X7 Pro

$369

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

$2899

Launch price difference: $2530. Poco X7 Pro was $2530 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (52/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (65/100 vs 63/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco X7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Poco X7 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Poco X7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Poco X7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco X7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco X7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Poco X7 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Poco X7 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.