Poco X7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco X7 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $369 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 64/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Poco X7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,884,839); the Poco X7 Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 309g).
Poco X7 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Lighter: 195g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $369 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (65/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (68/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1884839
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 6100
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Poco X7 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 5 points higher (69/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco X7 Pro leads (68/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (65/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Poco X7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1884839 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / HyperOS 2 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 160.8×75.2×8.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $369 | $2899 |
Poco X7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Poco X7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco X7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Poco X7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Poco X7 Pro by 35.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2530. Poco X7 Pro is cheaper by $2530.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (91/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco X7 Pro (52/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (65/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Poco X7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Poco X7 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco X7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco X7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco X7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco X7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Poco X7 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco X7 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.