Poco F6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco F6 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $290 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 63/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,704,455); the Poco F6 is noticeably lighter (179g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F6
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Poco F6 better?
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Lighter: 179g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $290 vs $2899
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1704455
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5017
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F6 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 6 points higher (69/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Poco F6 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco F6 (90/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F6 is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco F6 (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (72/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F6 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1704455 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1930 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5017 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 / HyperOS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2400 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 160.5×74.5×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $290 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Poco F6
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Poco F6
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F6
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F6 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Poco F6 by 41.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2609. Poco F6 was $2609 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco F6 (90/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F6 is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco F6 (52/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (72/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F6 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Poco F6 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F6 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F6 has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F6 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F6 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Poco F6 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F6 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.