Poco F4 GT vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco F4 GT (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $600 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 60/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,303,229); the Poco F4 GT is noticeably lighter (210g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F4 GT
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco F4 GT better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Lighter: 210g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $950
- Better portability (47/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1303229
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F4 GT vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 31 points higher (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Poco F4 GT — 34/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F4 GT is a bit better (47/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F4 GT | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1303229 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.7×8.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco F4 GT
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco F4 GT
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F4 GT
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F4 GT and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F4 GT by 69.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $350. Poco F4 GT was $350 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (99/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (96/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (85/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F4 GT is a bit better (47/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT by 31 points (91/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F4 GT and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F4 GT has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Poco F4 GT over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F4 GT is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.