Poco F4 GT vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Poco F4 GT (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $600 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 60/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,303,229).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F4 GT
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Poco F4 GT better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 210g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $840
- Better portability (47/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1303229
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 4700 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F4 GT vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 29 points higher (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Poco F4 GT — 34/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F4 GT is a bit better (47/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F4 GT | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1303229 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.7×8.5 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Poco F4 GT
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco F4 GT
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F4 GT
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F4 GT and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Poco F4 GT by 76.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $240. Poco F4 GT was $240 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (100/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (78/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (90/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F4 GT is a bit better (47/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT by 29 points (89/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F4 GT and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Poco F4 GT has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Poco F4 GT over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Poco F4 GT is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.