Poco F4 GT vs Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
The Poco F4 GT (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. Both devices score the same overall rating of 60/100. Key differences: the Poco F4 GT is faster in AnTuTu (1,303,229 vs 1,294,871); the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is noticeably lighter (194g vs 210g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F4 GT
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
What makes Poco F4 GT better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1303229 vs 1294871
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) better?
- Lighter: 194g vs 210g
- Better camera (45/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (57/100 vs 47/100)
Comparison verdict
The Poco F4 GT and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) received the same MobileRank rating — 60/100. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) and the Poco F4 GT are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) and the Poco F4 GT are nearly equal (45/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F4 GT is a bit better (58/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 47/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F4 GT | Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 1303229 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.7×8.5 mm | 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | — |
Camera comparison
Poco F4 GT
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Poco F4 GT
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F4 GT
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F4 GT and Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F4 GT leads Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) by 0.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) and the Poco F4 GT are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) and the Poco F4 GT are nearly equal (45/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F4 GT is a bit better (58/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 47/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?
Both devices scored 60/100. They are identical on performance — 68/100 for both. The clearest difference is portability: better on the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (57/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F4 GT and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?
The Poco F4 GT has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) — 60/100.
Should you choose the Poco F4 GT over the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?
The Poco F4 GT is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a better fit for active users.