Poco F2 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco F2 Pro (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $500 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 52/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 976,177).
Poco F2 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 219g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $950
- Better portability (40/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 976177
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1168
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3431
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Poco F2 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 39 points higher (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Poco F2 Pro — 30/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Poco F2 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 976177 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1168 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3431 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $500 | $950 |
Poco F2 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/1.89
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco F2 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F2 Pro
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Poco F2 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F2 Pro by 77.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $450. Poco F2 Pro was $450 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (99/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (89/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (85/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro by 39 points (91/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 46/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Poco F2 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F2 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.