Poco F2 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco F2 Pro (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $500 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 52/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 978,910).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F2 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco F2 Pro better?
- Lighter: 219g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $950
- Overall rating 52/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 978910
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1169
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3191
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F2 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 39 points higher (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Poco F2 Pro — 26/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Poco F2 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F2 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 978910 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1169 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3191 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.4×8.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $500 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco F2 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/1.89
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco F2 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F2 Pro
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F2 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F2 Pro by 77.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $450. Poco F2 Pro was $450 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (99/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (89/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro (85/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Poco F2 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F2 Pro by 39 points (91/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 46/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Poco F2 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.