Poco C40 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 11/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C40 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco C40 is noticeably lighter (204g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C40 by 46 points (57/100 vs 11/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C40
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 45
Design 45
Value for money 55
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 49
Battery 52
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Poco C40 better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
  • Lighter: 204g vs 309g

  • Better design/ergonomics (45/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (49/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C40 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 46 points higher (57/100 vs 11/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C40 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Poco C40: The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco C40 Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor JLQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2926532
Geekbench Single 3050
Geekbench Multi 9300
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1650 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 18W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 5 MP 10 MP
RAM 3GB / 4GB 16GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB 512GB
OS Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 400 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 204 g 309 g
Price $2899
Camera comparison
Poco C40
  • Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
49
camera
Display comparison
Poco C40
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1650
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Poco C40
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
52
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Poco C40
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
$2899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (67/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (49/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Poco C40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (45/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco C40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C40 by 46 points (57/100 vs 11/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C40 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Poco C40 has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Poco C40 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.