Poco C40 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Poco C40 (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 11/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP.
Poco C40
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 0/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Poco C40 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 26 points higher (37/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 leads (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Poco C40 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | JLQ | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 204 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (81/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (45/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Poco C40 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Poco C40 by 26 points (37/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C40 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Poco C40 has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C40 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C40 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.