Poco X4 NFC vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Poco X4 NFC (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 34/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP.
Poco X4 NFC
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 41/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 41/100)
Comparing the Poco X4 NFC vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 3 points higher (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X4 NFC leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Poco X4 NFC (81/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X4 NFC significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Poco X4 NFC | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 67W | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×76.2×8.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 207 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Poco X4 NFC
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Poco X4 NFC
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco X4 NFC
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Poco X4 NFC (81/100 vs 41/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco X4 NFC significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 41/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Poco X4 NFC or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Poco X4 NFC by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco X4 NFC and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Poco X4 NFC has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco X4 NFC or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Poco X4 NFC over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Poco X4 NFC is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.