Poco M7 vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

The Poco M7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $110 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 32/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M7 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 467,392); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco M7 doesn't.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 by 43 points (75/100 vs 32/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco M7
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 53
Design 20
Value for money 100
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Performance 84
Display 100
Camera 86
Battery 51
Design 32
Value for money 20
What makes Poco M7 better?
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper: $110 vs $1299

  • Longer battery life (53/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 467392
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 466
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 1396
  • Faster charging: 60W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 214g vs 224g

  • Higher performance (84/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (32/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco M7 vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 43 points higher (75/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 leads (100/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 (86/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (53/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (32/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (100/100 vs 20/100).

Poco M7: The Poco M7 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco M7 Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 467392 3515964
Geekbench Single 466 3601
Geekbench Multi 1396 10686
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2340 3120x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 12 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm
Weight 224 g 214 g
Price $110 $1299
Camera comparison
Poco M7
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Poco M7
  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Poco M7
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco M7 and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco M7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
32/100
467392 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
75/100 +86.7%
3515964 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Poco M7 by 86.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Poco M7
$110
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
$1299

Price difference: $1189. Poco M7 is cheaper by $1189.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 (84/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 (86/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (53/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (32/100 vs 20/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (100/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco M7 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M7 by 43 points (75/100 vs 32/100).

What is the rating of the Poco M7 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Poco M7 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco M7 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 24/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco M7 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (84/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Poco M7 over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Poco M7 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.