OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2500; launch prices were $600 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 72/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,289,696); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is thinner (6.5mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2289696
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4300 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1099
- Better camera (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2358 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8211 vs 6405
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 82/100)
- Better portability (83/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 11 points higher (83/100 vs 72/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 37/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — 54/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (66/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (83/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Samsung Exynos 2500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2289696 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 2358 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 8211 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2640x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 4300 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 137 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 166.7×75.2×6.5 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $1099 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- 4300 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 by 34.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $499. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $499 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (94/100 vs 70/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (66/100 vs 37/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (83/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — 72/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.