OPPO Find X9 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2500; launch prices were $1299 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra leads — 92/100 vs 72/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has the bigger battery (7050 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Find X9 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,231,988 vs 2,289,696); per DXOMark lab testing, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 137); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 235g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
What makes OPPO Find X9 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4231988 vs 2289696
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2358
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 8211
- Bigger battery: 7050 vs 4300 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 84/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (98/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 235g
- Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1299
- Better portability (83/100 vs 24/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Find X9 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra scores 20 points higher (92/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra leads (87/100 vs 37/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9 Ultra — 94/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — 54/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (98/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 significantly outperforms the OPPO Find X9 Ultra (83/100 vs 24/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 | |
| AnTuTu | 4231988 | 2289696 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 2358 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 8211 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 2640x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7050 mAh | 4300 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | 137 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 8.7×None×None mm | 166.7×75.2×6.5 mm | |
| Weight | 235 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $1099 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.65
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3120
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- 7050 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:45 hrs, total 37:00 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- 4300 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Find X9 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Find X9 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 by 84.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 was $200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (99/100 vs 84/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (98/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (96/100 vs 70/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (87/100 vs 37/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 significantly outperforms the OPPO Find X9 Ultra (83/100 vs 24/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Find X9 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 by 20 points (92/100 vs 72/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 92/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — 72/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 70/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X9 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 84/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Find X9 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7?
The OPPO Find X9 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.