OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $600 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 47/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 3300); the main camera is 200 MP vs 12 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,135,878).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1135878
- Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 3537
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 3300 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $999
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 19/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 82/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 better?
- Lighter: 183g vs 188g
- Better portability (76/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 36 points higher (83/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 19/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 — 4/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (82/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (94/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (66/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 is a bit better (76/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 1135878 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 1500 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 3537 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2640x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 3300 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 15W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 10W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 12 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 183 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $999 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
- Main: 12MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
- 3300 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 10W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 by 171.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $399. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $399 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (82/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (94/100 vs 16/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (66/100 vs 19/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 is a bit better (76/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 by 36 points (83/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 — 47/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 16/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 is a better fit for active users.