OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; launch prices were $600 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 48/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 607,489).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M17
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 607489
- Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 960
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 1826
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 192g
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $600
- Better portability (69/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 35 points higher (83/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 52/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy M17 — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (82/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (95/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (69/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 607489 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 960 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 1826 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $130 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 406.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $470. Samsung Galaxy M17 was $470 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (82/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (95/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (69/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 35 points (83/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.