OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Poco C65
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85; launch prices were $600 and $99. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 33/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 348,562).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Poco C65
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 1031
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 192g
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Poco C65 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $600
- Overall rating 33/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Poco C65, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 50 points higher (83/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 43/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Poco C65 — 56/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (82/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (95/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C65 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 348562 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $99 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Poco C65 by 783.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $501. Poco C65 was $501 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (82/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (95/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (94/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C65 (66/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 50 points (83/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Poco C65 — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.