OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Poco F7 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $600 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 82/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5300); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,932,885); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Poco F7 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2932885
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5300 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 212g
- Better camera (94/100 vs 71/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $600
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Poco F7 Ultra, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 1 points higher (83/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Poco F7 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (64/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Poco F7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2932885 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 5300 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $500 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F7 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco F7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Poco F7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Poco F7 Ultra by 5.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Poco F7 Ultra was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (84/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (64/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Poco F7 Ultra by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Poco F7 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Poco F7 Ultra — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Poco F7 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.