OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $661 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 82/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 is faster in AnTuTu (3,330,801 vs 3,032,039).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Vivo X300
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 206g
- Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 69/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo X300 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3330801 vs 3032039
- Better Geekbench Single: 3352 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10402 vs 8932
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $661
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 90/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 5 points higher (87/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 69/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Vivo X300 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 are nearly equal (59/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 3330801 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3352 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 10402 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $499 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 9.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $162. Vivo X300 was $162 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (94/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 are nearly equal (59/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Vivo X300 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X300 — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.