Infinix GT 20 Pro vs Realme GT 2 Pro
The Infinix GT 20 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, while the Realme GT 2 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT 2 Pro leads — 64/100 vs 60/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Realme GT 2 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 1,287,602).
Infinix GT 20 Pro
Realme GT 2 Pro
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 194g vs 199g
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 1287602
- Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 1256
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 4207
- Faster charging: 65W vs 45W
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 65/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 48/100)
Comparing the Infinix GT 20 Pro vs the Realme GT 2 Pro, the Realme GT 2 Pro scores 4 points higher (64/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro leads (57/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro and the Infinix GT 20 Pro are nearly equal (69/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro and the Infinix GT 20 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 60/100.
| Specification | Infinix GT 20 Pro | Realme GT 2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | |
| AnTuTu | 1287602 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1256 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4207 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, XOS 14 | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×75.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 194 g | 199 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Infinix GT 20 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Realme GT 2 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Infinix GT 20 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix GT 20 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix GT 20 Pro and Realme GT 2 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme GT 2 Pro leads Infinix GT 20 Pro by 0.3% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro and the Infinix GT 20 Pro are nearly equal (69/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro and the Infinix GT 20 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 60/100.
Which is better: the Infinix GT 20 Pro or the Realme GT 2 Pro?
The Realme GT 2 Pro edges out the Infinix GT 20 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 20 Pro and the Realme GT 2 Pro?
The Infinix GT 20 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Realme GT 2 Pro — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 20 Pro or the Realme GT 2 Pro?
The Realme GT 2 Pro leads on camera score (57/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 20 Pro over the Realme GT 2 Pro?
The Infinix GT 20 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Realme GT 2 Pro is a better fit for active users.