OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo iQOO 15

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $661 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 88/100 vs 87/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,032,039).

The Vivo iQOO 15 edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

Performance 90
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 59
Value for money 88

Vivo iQOO 15

Performance 98
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 90

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 205g vs 215g

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3032039
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2725
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 8932
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $661

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 90/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 1 points higher (88/100 vs 87/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 78/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 90/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 48/100).

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China): The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) Vivo iQOO 15
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3032039 3950082
Geekbench Single 2725 3639
Geekbench Multi 8932 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1272 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 205 g 215 g
Launch price $661 $599

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Vivo iQOO 15

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
87/100
3032039 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +23.2%
3950082 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 23.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

$661

Vivo iQOO 15

$599

Launch price difference: $62. Vivo iQOO 15 was $62 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (94/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (98/100 vs 90/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.