OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $661 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 87/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 3,032,039); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $899
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 3032039
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 8932
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 1 points higher (88/100 vs 87/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $899 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 8.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $238. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $238 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.