Oppo Reno12 (China) vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8250, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 66/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Oppo Reno12 (China) is noticeably lighter (179g vs 204g).
Oppo Reno12 (China)
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Lighter: 179g vs 204g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (86/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 5 points higher (71/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 56/100. In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (79/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (86/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 56/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (79/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition edges out the Oppo Reno12 (China) by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.