Motorola Moto E14 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Motorola Moto E14 (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 30/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 330,006); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto E14 doesn't; the Motorola Moto E14 is noticeably lighter (178g vs 204g).

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 by 41 points (71/100 vs 30/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto E14
Performance 27
Display 44
Camera 10
Battery 43
Portability 72
Value for money
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Motorola Moto E14 better?
  • Lighter: 178g vs 204g

  • Better portability (72/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 330006
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 378
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 1335
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (69/100 vs 27/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto E14 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 41 points higher (71/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (69/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (69/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto E14 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (72/100 vs 52/100).

Motorola Moto E14: The Motorola Moto E14 is a better fit for everyday use.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto E14 ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor Unisoc T606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 330006 1290942
Geekbench Single 378 1675
Geekbench Multi 1335 4453
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1612 1116x2480
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 15W 80W
Main camera 13 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 5 MP 16 MP
RAM 2GB / 4GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 64GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 (Go edition) Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 1500 nits
NFC no yes
Dimensions 163.5×74.5×8.0 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 178 g 204 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto E14
  • Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto E14
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto E14
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto E14 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto E14 Unisoc T606
30/100
330006 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +74.4%
1290942 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Motorola Moto E14 by 74.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (69/100 vs 27/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (80/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (86/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto E14 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (72/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E14 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 by 41 points (71/100 vs 30/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E14 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Motorola Moto E14 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto E14 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto E14 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (69/100 vs 27/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto E14 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Motorola Moto E14 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.