Motorola Razr Fold vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 71/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,290,942); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably lighter (204g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4453
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 204g vs 285g
- Overall rating 71/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 15 points higher (86/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (98/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 4453 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $1799 | — |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 205.4% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (98/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.