Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 71/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 1,290,942); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4453
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 204g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (86/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 5 points higher (76/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (68/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 4453 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $1099 | — |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 141.2% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (92/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (68/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra edges out the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.