Oppo Reno12 (China) vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8250, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads — 66/100 vs 58/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Oppo Reno12 (China) is noticeably lighter (179g vs 199g).
Oppo Reno12 (China)
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Faster charging: 80W vs 65W
- Lighter: 179g vs 199g
- Better camera (64/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 52/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 52/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the Oppo Reno12 (China) scores 8 points higher (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads (64/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (64/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (79/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (64/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (79/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) edges out the ZTE Axon 40 pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) leads on camera score (64/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.