Motorola Moto E32 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro

The Motorola Moto E32 (2022) runs on the Unisoc T606, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 30/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 16 MP vs 108 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 330,006); the ZTE Axon 40 pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto E32 doesn't; the Motorola Moto E32 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 199g).

The ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 by 28 points (58/100 vs 30/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto E32
Performance 27
Display 44
Camera 12
Battery 43
Portability 64
Value for money
ZTE Axon 40 pro
Performance 61
Display 89
Camera 44
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Motorola Moto E32 better?
  • Lighter: 184g vs 199g

  • Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 330006
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 378
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 1335
  • Faster charging: 65W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 16MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (61/100 vs 27/100)
  • Better camera (44/100 vs 12/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto E32 vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 28 points higher (58/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (61/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (44/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (61/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (89/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (44/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).

Motorola Moto E32: The Motorola Moto E32 is a better fit for everyday use.
ZTE Axon 40 pro: The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto E32 ZTE Axon 40 pro
Processor Unisoc T606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
AnTuTu 330006 1010069
Geekbench Single 378 1298
Geekbench Multi 1335 3520
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1080x2400
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 65W
Main camera 16 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 8 MP 16 MP
RAM 4GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 64GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 11 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits
NFC no yes
Dimensions 164.0×75.0×8.5 mm 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm
Weight 184 g 199 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto E32
  • Main: 16MP f/f/2.2
  • Front: 8MP
12
camera
ZTE Axon 40 pro
  • Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
44
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto E32
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display
ZTE Axon 40 pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto E32
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
ZTE Axon 40 pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto E32 and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto E32 Unisoc T606
30/100
330006 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
58/100 +67.3%
1010069 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 pro leads Motorola Moto E32 by 67.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (61/100 vs 27/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (89/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (44/100 vs 12/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E32 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 by 28 points (58/100 vs 30/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E32 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The Motorola Moto E32 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto E32 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (44/100 vs 12/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto E32 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (61/100 vs 27/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto E32 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?

The Motorola Moto E32 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.