Motorola Moto E32 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Motorola Moto E32 (2022) runs on the Unisoc T606, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 30/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 16 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 330,006); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto E32 doesn't; the Motorola Moto E32 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 204g).
Motorola Moto E32
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Lighter: 184g vs 204g
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 330006
- Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 1335
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 16MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto E32 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 41 points higher (71/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (69/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (69/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (86/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto E32 | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T606 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 330006 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 378 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1335 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.0×8.5 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Motorola Moto E32
- Main: 16MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Moto E32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto E32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Moto E32 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Motorola Moto E32 by 74.4% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (69/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (80/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (86/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E32 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 by 41 points (71/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E32 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Moto E32 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto E32 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 12/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto E32 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (69/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto E32 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Motorola Moto E32 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.