Nubia Red Magic 6 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Nubia Red Magic 6 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. Both devices score the same overall rating of 58/100. Key differences: the Nubia Red Magic 6 has the bigger battery (5050 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 108 MP; the Nubia Red Magic 6 is faster in AnTuTu (1,119,714 vs 1,010,069); the ZTE Axon 40 pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 220g).
Nubia Red Magic 6
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 1119714 vs 1010069
- Better Geekbench Single: 1488 vs 1298
- Bigger battery: 5050 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 65W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (63/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 3373
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Lighter: 199g vs 220g
- Better camera (44/100 vs 41/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 32/100)
The Nubia Red Magic 6 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro received the same MobileRank rating — 58/100. In the "performance" category, the Nubia Red Magic 6 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Nubia Red Magic 6 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia Red Magic 6 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 6 (52/100 vs 32/100).
| Specification | Nubia Red Magic 6 | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 1119714 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1488 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3373 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5050 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 630 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 169.9×77.2×9.7 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 220 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $500 | — |
Nubia Red Magic 6
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Nubia Red Magic 6
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nubia Red Magic 6
- 5050 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nubia Red Magic 6 and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nubia Red Magic 6 leads ZTE Axon 40 pro by 10.9% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Nubia Red Magic 6 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Nubia Red Magic 6 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nubia Red Magic 6 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 6 (52/100 vs 32/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Red Magic 6 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
Both devices scored 58/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Nubia Red Magic 6.
What is the rating of the Nubia Red Magic 6 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nubia Red Magic 6 has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Should you choose the Nubia Red Magic 6 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nubia Red Magic 6 is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.