Oppo Reno12 (China) vs ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
The Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8250, while the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads — 66/100 vs 61/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno12 (China) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP.
Oppo Reno12 (China)
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4200 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 183g
- Better camera (64/100 vs 63/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 30/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G, the Oppo Reno12 (China) scores 5 points higher (66/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads (56/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (56/100 vs 30/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1119714 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1488 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3373 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | — | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | 163.6×75.3×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 183 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Front: —
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 4200 mAh
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (56/100 vs 30/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) edges out the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G — 61/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a better fit for active users.