Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Poco F7 Pro
The Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8250, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 66/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Oppo Reno12 (China) is noticeably lighter (179g vs 220g).
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Poco F7 Pro
- Lighter: 179g vs 220g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 46/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Better camera (67/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Poco F7 Pro scores 14 points higher (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Oppo Reno12 (China) are nearly equal (67/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (79/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | Poco F7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2180606 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 220 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Oppo Reno12 (China) are nearly equal (67/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (87/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (79/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno12 (China) — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the Poco F7 Pro?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the Poco F7 Pro?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.