OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $661 and $889. Both devices score the same overall rating of 86/100. Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 3,079,298).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $889
- Better camera (94/100 vs 93/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 8358
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra received the same MobileRank rating — 86/100. Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | — | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $889 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads OPPO Reno 16 Pro by 0.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $228. OPPO Reno 16 Pro was $228 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
Both devices scored 86/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo X200 Ultra.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.