Nokia 3.4 vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro

The Nokia 3.4 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 22/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 251,428).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 by 64 points (86/100 vs 22/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 3.4
Performance 18
Display 39
Camera 12
Battery 22
Portability 64
Value for money
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
What makes Nokia 3.4 better?

  • Better portability (64/100 vs 54/100)
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 251428
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 272
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 992
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 18/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 12/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 3.4 vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 64 points higher (86/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (89/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (94/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (83/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.4 is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).

Nokia 3.4: The Nokia 3.4 is a better fit for everyday use.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 3.4 OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 251428 3079298
Geekbench Single 272 2680
Geekbench Multi 992 8358
Display 6.4" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1560 2772x1272
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 10W 80W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 50 MP
RAM 3GB / 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 10, planned upgrade to Android 11 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 400 nits 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 161.0×76.0×8.7 mm 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm
Weight 180 g
Launch price $661
Camera comparison
Nokia 3.4
  • Main: 13MP
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 8MP
12
camera
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 3.4
  • 6.4" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1560
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 3.4
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 3.4 and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 3.4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
22/100
251428 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100 +91.8%
3079298 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Nokia 3.4 by 91.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 3.4
Price unknown
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (89/100 vs 18/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (84/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (94/100 vs 12/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 (83/100 vs 22/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.4 is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 3.4 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.4 by 64 points (86/100 vs 22/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia 3.4 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Nokia 3.4 has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 3.4 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 12/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia 3.4 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 18/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 3.4 over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?

The Nokia 3.4 is a better fit for everyday use. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.