Nokia C31 vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
The Nokia C31 (2022) runs on the Unisoc, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 35/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5050); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C31 doesn't.
Nokia C31
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Overall rating 35/100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5050 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 53/100)
Comparing the Nokia C31 vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 51 points higher (86/100 vs 35/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (84/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C31 (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Nokia C31 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Nokia C31 | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 8358 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5050 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | $661 |
Nokia C31
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nokia C31
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C31
- 5050 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Nokia C31
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (84/100 vs 37/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (94/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C31 (83/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Nokia C31 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C31 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 by 51 points (86/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C31 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Nokia C31 has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C31 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C31 over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Nokia C31 is a better fit for everyday use. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.