OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs ZTE V40 Pro
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 55/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE V40 Pro doesn't.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
ZTE V40 Pro
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 65W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (62/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 31 points higher (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (94/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (83/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (62/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | — |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (94/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (83/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (62/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro by 31 points (86/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.