Oppo A92 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Oppo A92 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 36/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 329,457); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A92 doesn't; the Oppo A92 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo A92
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Oppo A92 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 226g
- Better portability (55/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 329457
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 321
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1128
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo A92 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 52 points higher (88/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (94/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo A92 (84/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo A92 is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo A92 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10; ColorOS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.0×75.5×8.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Oppo A92
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Oppo A92
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo A92
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo A92 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Oppo A92 by 90.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo A92
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (94/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo A92 (84/100 vs 58/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (81/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo A92 is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo A92 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 by 52 points (88/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo A92 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo A92 has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo A92 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo A92 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Oppo A92 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.