Oppo A92 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Oppo A92 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 36/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 329,457); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A92 doesn't; the Oppo A92 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo A92
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Oppo A92 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 230g
- Better portability (55/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 329457
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 321
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1128
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo A92 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 55 points higher (91/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (99/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo A92 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10; ColorOS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.0×75.5×8.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Oppo A92
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Oppo A92
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo A92
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo A92 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Oppo A92 by 92.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo A92
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (99/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (89/100 vs 58/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (85/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo A92 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo A92 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 by 55 points (91/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo A92 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Oppo A92 has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo A92 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo A92 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Oppo A92 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.